Standard Clauses in Contracts: What They Are And How To Draft Them

Standard Clauses in Contracts: A Comprehensive Guide

What are contractual standard clauses? Contracts are the backbone of most business transactions, ensuring that the rights and obligations of all parties involved are clearly defined. While every contract is unique, most include certain standard clauses, also known as boilerplate clauses, that provide a legal framework governing the agreement. These clauses ensure that the contract functions smoothly, minimizing ambiguity and reducing the potential for disputes. In this article, we’ll explore the most common standard clauses in contracts, their significance, and why they are essential in contract drafting.

What Are Standard Clauses in Contracts?

Standard clauses, sometimes referred to as boilerplate clauses, are pre-drafted provisions that are commonly found in most contracts. These clauses are used across various types of agreements, from employment contracts to sale agreements, rental contracts, and service-level agreements.

The purpose of these clauses is to address the procedural aspects of a contract rather than its specific subject matter. They help clarify how disputes will be resolved, how communication between the parties should occur, and the legal jurisdiction governing the contract. Though these clauses may seem secondary to the core of the agreement, they play a critical role in preventing legal misunderstandings and disputes.

Common Standard Clauses in Contracts

1. Governing Law Clause
   The governing law clause identifies which jurisdiction’s laws will be applied to interpret the contract. This is particularly important in international agreements where the parties might be operating under different legal systems. For example, a contract between a US and a UK business may state that it is governed by the laws of New York or England. Example:
   “This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of [State], without regard to its conflict of law provisions.”
2. Dispute Resolution Clause
   Disputes are inevitable in contractual relationships. The dispute resolution clause specifies how conflicts between the parties will be resolved—whether through litigation, arbitration, or mediation. Some contracts may also require disputes to be resolved in a specific jurisdiction or court. Example:
   “Any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be resolved through binding arbitration in [City], in accordance with the rules of the [Arbitration Body].”
3. Force Majeure Clause
   A force majeure clause excuses a party from fulfilling their contractual obligations due to events outside their control, such as natural disasters, war, or pandemics. This clause helps protect parties from liability for non-performance when unforeseen circumstances make contract execution impossible. Example:
   “Neither party shall be liable for any failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement if such failure is caused by circumstances beyond its reasonable control, including, but not limited to, acts of God, war, terrorism, and natural disasters.”
4. Entire Agreement Clause
   This clause ensures that the contract represents the full and final understanding between the parties. It supersedes any prior agreements, representations, or understandings, whether oral or written. Example:
   “This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations, both written and oral.”
5. Confidentiality Clause
   A confidentiality clause prevents the parties from disclosing sensitive information that was shared during the negotiation or execution of the contract. This is particularly common in non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and employment contracts. Example:
   “The parties agree to keep all confidential information received from the other party in connection with this Agreement strictly confidential and not to disclose such information to any third party without the prior written consent of the other party.”
6. Severability Clause
   The severability clause ensures that if any part of the contract is found to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will still be valid. This clause protects the contract from being entirely voided due to a single unenforceable term. Example:
   “If any provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.”
7. Termination Clause
   A termination clause outlines the conditions under which the contract can be terminated by either party. It usually includes the notice period required for termination and the circumstances that may lead to contract cancellation. Example:
   “Either party may terminate this Agreement upon [Number] days’ written notice to the other party, or immediately in the event of a material breach of this Agreement.”
8. Assignment Clause
   This clause specifies whether the parties are allowed to transfer their rights and obligations under the contract to a third party. It is particularly relevant in agreements involving intellectual property or financial rights. Example:
   “Neither party may assign or transfer its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party.”
9. Indemnity Clause
   The indemnity clause obligates one party to compensate the other for any losses or damages that arise from breaches of the agreement or other specific actions. This clause is particularly common in service contracts, where one party may be at risk of damages due to the other’s actions. Example:
   “The Service Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client from any and all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney’s fees, arising out of the Service Provider’s performance of this Agreement.”
10. Waiver Clause
    The waiver clause specifies that any failure to enforce a provision of the contract will not be considered a waiver of future enforcement of that provision. This ensures that parties do not inadvertently lose their rights by failing to act on a breach immediately. Example:
    “No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.”

The Importance of Standard Clauses in Contracts

Standard clauses, although often overlooked, play an integral role in the structure and enforceability of a contract. They help to mitigate risk by ensuring that both parties have agreed on how potential issues will be handled, from breaches to unforeseen external events. In addition, they contribute to the clarity and precision of the contract, reducing the likelihood of future disputes.

When drafting or reviewing a contract, it is essential to carefully consider these clauses. Though many boilerplate clauses may seem routine, they can have significant legal consequences. Consulting with a legal professional is often advisable to ensure that the clauses meet the specific needs of the agreement and are enforceable in the relevant jurisdiction.

What to Be Careful About When Drafting Standard Clauses

While standard clauses offer structure and predictability, they are not “one-size-fits-all.” Careful drafting is essential to avoid costly mistakes or unintended consequences. Here are several key considerations when incorporating boilerplate clauses into contracts:

1. Tailoring to the Specific Jurisdiction

Many businesses make the mistake of using standard clauses without considering local laws. Contract laws vary significantly between jurisdictions, and a clause that is valid in one location may not hold up in another. For instance, certain jurisdictions may impose specific requirements for dispute resolution, limit indemnity clauses, or invalidate waivers of liability.

Key considerations:

• Ensure the governing law clause aligns with the legal system most favorable to your case.
• Understand the local courts’ stance on force majeure, indemnity, and non-compete clauses.

2. Overly Broad or Unenforceable Clauses

Clauses such as non-compete, confidentiality, and indemnity often face legal challenges when they are too broad or unfair. Courts may strike down parts of the contract if they find them unreasonable or unenforceable. For example, a non-compete clause that prevents an employee from working in the same industry for an indefinite period may be void in many jurisdictions.

Key considerations:

• Be mindful of reasonableness in drafting restrictive covenants like non-compete clauses, balancing the interests of both parties.
• Avoid drafting force majeure clauses so broadly that they become unenforceable or lead to disputes over interpretation.

3. Ambiguity in Key Terms

Ambiguity is one of the most common causes of contractual disputes. Even though standard clauses are designed to prevent ambiguity, they can themselves become problematic if the language used is unclear or too vague. Terms like “reasonable efforts” or “commercially reasonable” may leave too much room for interpretation, potentially leading to disputes.

Key considerations:

• Use clear, precise language that all parties understand.
• Define key terms where necessary, especially for clauses relating to performance standards, indemnity, and confidentiality.

4. Lack of Consistency with Other Contract Terms

It’s vital that standard clauses are consistent with the core terms of the contract. A common pitfall is to include a boilerplate clause that contradicts or overrides another provision in the agreement, leading to confusion or legal disputes. For example, a contract might contain a dispute resolution clause that requires arbitration, but elsewhere suggests that disputes should be resolved in court.

Key considerations:

• Review the contract as a whole to ensure internal consistency.
• Make sure that procedural clauses, such as those for dispute resolution or jurisdiction, align with the substantive parts of the agreement.

5. Failing to Address Unique Risks

Standard clauses can sometimes be too generic to cover the unique risks of a specific transaction. For instance, a force majeure clause may not be sufficient if a business operates in a politically unstable region, or an indemnity clause may need to be broader in high-risk industries like construction or manufacturing.

Key considerations:

• Tailor boilerplate clauses to address industry-specific risks.
• Ensure that risk-related clauses, such as indemnity, force majeure, and limitation of liability, are broad enough to cover specific risks but not so broad that they risk being unenforceable.

6. One-Sided Clauses

Many contracts are drafted with boilerplate clauses that heavily favor one party, which can lead to unbalanced obligations. For example, an indemnity clause that only protects one party might deter the other from entering the contract or lead to legal challenges. Courts are generally more inclined to scrutinize agreements that appear unfair or overly one-sided.

Key considerations:

• Strive for balance between the parties’ rights and obligations.
• Avoid excessive liability limitations or clauses that shift all the risk to one party.

7. Inadequate Attention to Dispute Resolution

Parties often overlook the significance of the dispute resolution clause, assuming disputes won’t arise. However, how disputes are resolved can have a major impact on the cost and duration of the conflict. For example, arbitration may be faster and less costly than litigation, but it might not be the best option for every dispute. In some cases, mediation may provide a more amicable resolution process.

Key considerations:

• Assess whether arbitration, mediation, or litigation is the most suitable form of dispute resolution.
• Be specific about the location and rules that will govern any arbitration or litigation.

8. Ignoring Future Changes in Law

Laws can change, rendering certain clauses invalid or unenforceable. For instance, data protection laws have evolved rapidly in recent years with the introduction of regulations like GDPR. Contracts that fail to comply with these updated laws may face penalties or even termination.

Key considerations:

• Regularly review and update contracts to ensure compliance with evolving legislation.
• Include a severability clause to ensure the remainder of the contract remains enforceable if a specific provision becomes void.

Best Practices for Drafting Standard Clauses

To avoid these pitfalls, consider the following best practices when drafting or reviewing standard clauses:

• Consult legal professionals: Always consult with a lawyer who understands the relevant jurisdiction and industry-specific risks.
• Customize boilerplate clauses: Tailor the standard clauses to the specific contract and context, rather than copying them from another agreement.
• Use plain language: Avoid legal jargon and ambiguous terms that may cause confusion.
• Review periodically: Ensure that the clauses are periodically reviewed and updated to reflect changes in law or business circumstances.
• Balance fairness and protection: Draft clauses that protect your interests while ensuring fairness to the other party, avoiding one-sided terms that could be contested in court.

Standard clauses, while often regarded as routine, are essential for structuring a robust and enforceable contract. However, care must be taken to draft them thoughtfully, with attention to jurisdictional differences, clarity, and fairness. By avoiding common pitfalls and applying best practices, you can ensure that your contracts minimize legal risks and offer maximum protection to all parties involved.

Understanding standard clauses in contracts is critical for anyone involved in business, legal, or personal agreements. By including well-drafted boilerplate clauses, parties can protect themselves from unforeseen risks and ensure smoother execution of the contract. Whether you are drafting a contract or entering into an agreement, these clauses provide the legal framework necessary for fair and predictable outcomes.

Related Analysis in LAW

LAW

LAW

Case Law – Collins v. University of New Hampshire (1st Cir. 2011), a Landmark Case

Read Module →